Pigs is Pigs — Story, Setting & Ideas

  459   2
Butler, Ellis Parker, 1869-1937 Project Gutenberg 1999
Short stories; Humorous stories Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words: 6,517
Reading time: 29 min
Text sections: 1
Ellis Parker Butler's story follows express agent Mike Flannery's literal interpretation of company rules when shipping guinea pigs, leading to a bureaucratic comedy of errors as the animals multiply uncontrollably.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.3/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

Edition quality

Ellis Parker Butler's 'Pigs is Pigs' (1905) derives its comedy from a single bureaucratic impasse: is a guinea pig a 'pet' or a 'pig' for shipping purposes? The story opens with a heated argument between Mike Flannery, the Westcote express agent, and Mr. Morehouse, who wants to ship two guinea pigs at the pet rate of twenty-five cents each. Flannery insists on the pig rate of thirty cents, citing a rule that when in doubt, the agent shall charge the larger. His mantra, 'Pigs is pigs,' becomes the story's comic engine.

The Rulebook as Comic Antagonist

The story's humor hinges on the clash between literal rule-following and common sense. Flannery brandishes a 'flimsy printed book' of rates, pointing to page sixty-four to justify his position. The rule he cites—'Whin the agint be in anny doubt regardin' which of two rates applies to a shipment, he shall charge the larger'—gives him license to classify the guinea pigs as pigs. Mr. Morehouse's sarcastic spelling of 'P-e-t-s' and his arithmetic ('Two times twenty-five are fifty') are powerless against Flannery's stubborn adherence to the printed word. The rulebook, not the animals, drives the plot.

Multiplication as Narrative Engine

Butler escalates the conflict by having the guinea pigs reproduce. Flannery's initial refusal to release the animals leads to a delay, during which 'sixty-nine guinea-pigs had been born.' The numbers quickly spiral: two hundred and six, then seven hundred and four. Flannery hires six boys to build cages from soap boxes and cracker boxes, shipping two hundred and eighty cases in a week. The company's telegram—'Stop sending pigs. Warehouse full'—is met with 'Can't stop.' The inspector who arrives finds Flannery shoveling guinea pigs into bushel baskets with a coal scoop. The physical comedy of the multiplying animals transforms a bureaucratic dispute into a farce of logistics.

Voice and Dialect as Characterization

Butler gives Flannery a thick Irish dialect that reinforces his role as the inflexible enforcer of rules. His speech is peppered with phrases like 'thim,' 'ut,' and 'be,' and he refers to 'dago pigs or Irish pigs' as indistinguishable. His logic is circular: 'Th' nationality of the pig creates no differentiality in the rate.' Even after the crisis, his conclusion—'pigs is pets—an' cows is pets—an' horses is pets'—shows he has learned nothing except to apply the lower rate to all livestock. The dialect is not merely decorative; it anchors the story's humor in a specific character whose voice remains consistent from the first argument to the final shovel.

The Limits of the Excerpt

The excerpt covers the entire story, from the initial dispute to Flannery's final shoveling and his relieved remark, 'What if thim dago pigs had been elephants!' The narrative is complete, with a clear arc: a simple disagreement escalates into a logistical nightmare, resolved only when Flannery abandons the rules entirely. However, the excerpt does not include any framing device or authorial commentary beyond the dialogue and action. The story stands as a self-contained comic sketch, relying on repetition and escalation rather than character development or thematic depth.

Readers should note how Butler uses a single premise—the ambiguity of a rate classification—to generate escalating absurdity. The story rewards attention to Flannery's dialect and the precise wording of the rules, as each new development follows logically from the initial stubbornness. The guinea pigs themselves remain almost incidental; the real subject is the human capacity for literal-mindedness and the chaos it can produce.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks